Skip to main content

Finding Local Solutions to Emerging Health Challenges

UW CSiM is a collaborative tackling today's stewardship challenges in rural medicine. Join us!

ASB 101

Description


Review of reflex of urine cultures in clinic and hospital.

Core Elements

Education

Educating clinicians about resistance and optimal prescribing.

PDSA Cycles


Progress on PDSA Cycle 2

Begin processing mapping, hold data collection.


Your organization has completed the following PDSA cycles. Click a heading to view a cycle's details.

Goal: 

  • Speak at interdiscplinary huddle about AMS everyday – ASB comes up
    • Nursing – urine culture if patient has confusion
      • Providers lately have been saying it is ASB and to gold off

Data Collection: 

  • Kate doing data – keeping spreadsheet to more easily enter data
    • In ER, on antibiotic – gets admitted to floor or discharged
  • Questions
    • Evaluating provider vs prescribing provider
      • Want to capture prescribing provider (easier to see in chart and make ultimate decision about prescription)
      • Choose one method and keep consistent
      • Both prescribers – one IV, one PO
        • Would like to get both sets of providers
      • Start with first provider to capture momentum
        • For Skyline, get most benefit from continuing provider (hospitalist, admitting hospitalist)
          • Diff benefits when intervening at either level
      • Diagnositic momentum vs catching ASB in ER
    • Duration of therapy – capture all together (IV and oral)
    • Will do admitting provider
    • Meet first exclusion – do not enter data
  • Puts in any one that gets a UA

Facility/AMS program background: 

  • Been in TASP for 5 years
    • Had a site visit early on
    • Foundation and support for transforming use of antibiotics at Skyline
  • Amy (pharmacy manager) and Kate (nurse IP)
    • Head hospitalist and supporting hospitalist have been supportive (provider buy-in – 80% of hospitalist coverage)
    • Kate has been at Skyline for 14 years
  • Few weeks ago – had interdisciplinary huddle
    • Routine daily conversations using info from TASP – need to do fewer ID consults
  • Patient population
    • Lower income, also have other side
    • Some drug abuse, no homeless population
    • Elderly (65-70+), don’t keep pediatrics
    • Swing bed – long term abx from larger facilities
    • outpatient infusion service
  • In-patient beds: 12 beds – acute, obs and swing bed
  • Urinalysis reflex – urine cultures sent to Labcorp
    • 3-5 days for results (5 days more common)
    • Follow cultures after discharge – sometimes reevaluate or reach out to PCP to change therapy
      • Hard to track lab results, can be missed (bad process)
  • ER process – ED callback result
  • Use Cerner community works
    • Does not flag as abnormal
  • Staffing model
    • ER – contracted group – consistent
    • Hospitalist – consistent (2 that do bulk)
      • Most know system
    • Clinic relatively consistent as well
  • AMS program:
    • Kate, Amy, Dr. Swanson (hospitalist and chief of staff), Heidi (quality manager)
      • Quality manager makes graphs, trends ABX use, benchmarking – presented quarterly at PNT then presented at medstaff)
    • Grant funding to pay for TASP – get a lot of buy-in from leadership meeting

 

Kate is collecting data (200!), clinic data is more challenging to collect. Clinic uses own dipstick and collects own info, will send all to culture.

Kate designed process to collect data with excel sheet and the process works to gather enough data.

Data collection process works!